On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 7:47 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 14:28:28 -0500 > Liam Beguin <liambeguin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > Not sure if it would help but maybe it's worth a local define > of something like > > #define MULT9 1000000000LL > to loose the association with any particular SI basis and > just indicate it's a bit number being used to retain precision > in some maths? Would need a comment to stop people sending > patches to replace it with GIGA though ;) > > My ultimate preference here is for whatever works for Peter and > Liam as the people who are mostly likely to have to deal > with any changes to this driver in the future. SI multipliers are for values with the physical meaning. While Peter found them confusing, it's a pretty much win in my opinion when we talk about data from nature. For the pure mathematical scale it may be confusing. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
