Hi,
The driver I'm working on has channels which can be configured similarly but with small changes. In order to simplify the code, I used macros with arguments for the parts that are different.
Unfortunately this leads to warnings during the checkpatch with --strict .
CHECK: Macro argument reuse 'num' - possible side-effects?
+#define ADE9078_POWER_FACTOR_CHANNEL(num, name) { \
+ .type = IIO_POWER, \
+ .channel = num, \
+ .address = ADE9078_ADDR_ADJUST(ADE9078_REG_APF, num), \
+ .extend_name = name "_factor", \
+ .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | \
+ BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE), \
+ .scan_index = -1 \
+}
Is there any way to fix this warning without adding more arguments?
In this case, can it be ignored?
Regards,
Ciprian
