On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:07:10 +0000
cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Return value from ads8688_prog_write() directly instead
> of taking this in another redundant variable.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
applied,
Thanks,
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c
> index 79c803537dc4..2e24717d7f55 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c
> @@ -281,12 +281,10 @@ static int ads8688_write_reg_range(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> enum ads8688_range range)
> {
> unsigned int tmp;
> - int ret;
>
> tmp = ADS8688_PROG_REG_RANGE_CH(chan->channel);
> - ret = ads8688_prog_write(indio_dev, tmp, range);
>
> - return ret;
> + return ads8688_prog_write(indio_dev, tmp, range);
> }
>
> static int ads8688_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
