Hi,
Le mar., nov. 23 2021 at 21:09:32 +0000, Jonathan Cameron
<jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Letting the compiler remove these functions when the kernel is built
without CONFIG_PM_SLEEP support is simpler and less error prone than
the
use of #ifdef based config guards.
Removing instances of this approach from IIO also stops them being
copied into new drivers.
The pm_ptr() macro only removes the reference if CONFIG_PM is not
set. It is possible for CONFIG_PM=y without CONFIG_SLEEP, so this
will not always remove the pm_ops structure.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
No pm_ptr() for this one?
-Paul
---
drivers/iio/accel/da280.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/da280.c b/drivers/iio/accel/da280.c
index 9633bdae5fd4..91ac478891ce 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/da280.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/da280.c
@@ -153,17 +153,15 @@ static int da280_probe(struct i2c_client
*client,
return devm_iio_device_register(&client->dev, indio_dev);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-static int da280_suspend(struct device *dev)
+static __maybe_unused int da280_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
return da280_enable(to_i2c_client(dev), false);
}
-static int da280_resume(struct device *dev)
+static __maybe_unused int da280_resume(struct device *dev)
{
return da280_enable(to_i2c_client(dev), true);
}
-#endif
static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(da280_pm_ops, da280_suspend, da280_resume);
--
2.34.0
