Il giorno gio 28 ott 2021 alle ore 12:26 Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 1:18 PM Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This is similar to find_closest() and find_closest_descending(), but, it
> > doesn't make any assumption about the array being ordered.
>
> Macros in general are not so welcoming.
> Why do you do it as a macro?
Honestly, I did that just because find_closest() and
find_closest_descending() are macros (i.e. to be consistent wrt them).
I see no drawbacks in making this a regular function indeed; just, do
you have any advice about where should it live?
> ...
>
> > +#include <linux/math.h>
>
> Wondering if the current header misses other inclusions it's a direct user of.
Looking at it, it seems that also __find_closest() actually needs
math.h because it (apparently incorrectly[*]) uses
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST()..
[*]Indeed it seems there is another issue here about find_closest():
for example it picks the 1st element while searching for "2" in an
array like this: {1,2,..} ..This needs to be reported/fixed..
> ...
>
> > +/**
> > + * find_closest_unsorted - locate the closest element in a unsorted array
>
> an
>
> > + * @x: The reference value.
> > + * @a: The array in which to look for the closest element.
> > + * @as: Size of 'a'.
> > + *
> > + * Similar to find_closest() but 'a' has no requirement to being sorted
> > + */
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
