On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:08:21AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 01:55:21PM -0500, David Lechner wrote: > > This removes the chrdev_lock from the counter subsystem. This was > > intended to prevent opening the chrdev more than once. However, this > > doesn't work in practice since userspace can duplicate file descriptors > > and pass file descriptors to other processes. Since this protection > > can't be relied on, it is best to just remove it. > > Much better, thanks! > > One remaining question: > > > --- a/include/linux/counter.h > > +++ b/include/linux/counter.h > > @@ -297,7 +297,6 @@ struct counter_ops { > > * @events: queue of detected Counter events > > * @events_wait: wait queue to allow blocking reads of Counter events > > * @events_lock: lock to protect Counter events queue read operations > > - * @chrdev_lock: lock to limit chrdev to a single open at a time > > * @ops_exist_lock: lock to prevent use during removal > > Why do you still need 2 locks for the same structure? > > thanks, > > greg k-h Originally there was only the events_lock mutex. Initially I tried using it to also limit the chrdev to a single open, but then came across a "lock held when returning to user space" warning: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/YOq19zTsOzKA8v7c@shinobu/T/#m6072133d418d598a5f368bb942c945e46cfab9a5 Instead of losing the benefits of a mutex lock for protecting the events, I ultimately implemented the chrdev_lock separately as an atomic_t. If the chrdev_lock is removed, then we'll use events_lock solely from now on for this structure. William Breathitt Gray
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature