The length of hw->settings->odr_table is 2 and ref_sensor->id is an enum
variable whose value is between 0 and 5.
However, the value ST_LSM6DSX_ID_MAX (i.e. 5) is not catched properly in
switch (sensor->id) {
If ref_sensor->id is ST_LSM6DSX_ID_MAX, an array overflow will ocurrs in
function st_lsm6dsx_check_odr():
odr_table = &sensor->hw->settings->odr_table[sensor->id];
and in function st_lsm6dsx_set_odr():
reg = &hw->settings->odr_table[ref_sensor->id].reg;
To fix this array overflow, handle ST_LSM6DSX_ID_GYRO explicitly and
return -EINVAL for the default case.
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Teng Qi <starmiku1207184332@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
* explicitly handle ST_LSM6DSX_ID_GYRO and return -EINVAL for the default
case instead of adding an if statement behind the switch statement.
Thank Lars-Peter Clausen for helpful and friendly advice.
---
drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
index db45f1fc0b81..8dbf744c5651 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
@@ -1279,6 +1279,8 @@ st_lsm6dsx_set_odr(struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor, u32 req_odr)
int err;
switch (sensor->id) {
+ case ST_LSM6DSX_ID_GYRO:
+ break;
case ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT0:
case ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT1:
case ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT2:
@@ -1304,8 +1306,8 @@ st_lsm6dsx_set_odr(struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor, u32 req_odr)
}
break;
}
- default:
- break;
+ default: /* should never occur */
+ return -EINVAL;
}
if (req_odr > 0) {
--
2.25.1
