On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 04:42:53PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 12:13:36 +0300
> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The "idx" is validated at the start of the loop but it gets incremented
> > during the iteration so it needs to be checked again.
> >
> > Fixes: 50dd64d57eee ("iio: common: ssp_sensors: Add sensorhub driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is only a fix if we assume that the len value check is there
> as a protection against buffer overrun rather than as a termination condition
> that occurs when parsing a valid record.
>
> There is more paranoid checking in ssp_print_mc_debug() so it seems we aren't assuming
> valid data in there at least.
>
> Still is this perhaps a case of hardening rather than a fix or am I missing something?
>
Yeah. This is from static analysis. It's not a bug that probably
affects real life.
I guess it's debatable if it should get a Fixes tag, but I feel like
everything should be written in a hardened way. Plus with the Fixes tag
it will get backported.
> As an aside, if that ssp_print_mcu_debug() reads a negative char it is then
> returned directly so we get a random small negative number as the error code which
> isn't going to be very useful.
That's true. I will send that as a separate fix though. Definitely
with a Fixes tag on that. ;)
regards,
dan carpenter
