On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 12:23 PM Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:14:41 +0100 > Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > We have no known users of these in the wild. > > it seems very unlikely these are real IDS having the form ADCXXXX > > as that ID is owned by Achnor Datacomm not TI. > > > > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Kunyang reports that ACPI ID ADC081C is out in the wild on some > AAEON boards. Can AAEON clarify about all IDs in the kernel they have been (ab)using so far? Then we probably need some comments. Also I would like to be assured by AAEON that they won't make such mistakes in the future. > I'll send out a partial revert soon to bring back that ID with appropriate > comments on where it was used. Yes, please. > Key thing in future for these sorts of IDs is we need clarity > on who is using them before agreeing to take them. In this particular > my undestanding is the driver came first and as it worked the AAEON > firmware team used the ID. Yes, because it's definitely not an officially registered one. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
