Hi Nuno,
"Sa, Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Fri, 20 Aug 2021 07:28:17
+0000:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:12 PM
> > To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>; Lars-Peter Clausen
> > <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-
> > iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Miquel Raynal
> > <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH 12/16] iio: adc: max1027: Introduce an end of
> > conversion helper
> >
> > [External]
> >
> > For now this helper only waits for the maximum duration of a
> > conversion,
> > but it will soon be improved to properly handle the end of conversion
> > interrupt.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> > index afc3ce69f7ea..2d6485591761 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> > @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@
> > #define MAX1027_NAVG_32 (0x03 << 2)
> > #define MAX1027_AVG_EN BIT(4)
> >
> > +/* Device can achieve 300ksps so we assume a 3.33us conversion
> > delay */
> > +#define MAX1027_CONVERSION_UDELAY 4
> > +
> > enum max1027_id {
> > max1027,
> > max1029,
> > @@ -236,6 +239,20 @@ struct max1027_state {
> > u8 reg ____cacheline_aligned;
> > };
> >
> > +static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(max1027_queue);
> > +
> > +static int max1027_wait_eoc(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int conversion_time =
> > MAX1027_CONVERSION_UDELAY;
> > +
> > + if (indio_dev->active_scan_mask)
> > + conversion_time *= hweight32(*indio_dev-
> > >active_scan_mask);
> > +
> > + usleep_range(conversion_time, conversion_time * 2);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* Scan from 0 to the highest requested channel */
> > static int max1027_configure_chans_to_scan(struct iio_dev
> > *indio_dev)
> > {
> > @@ -310,9 +327,11 @@ static int max1027_read_single_value(struct
> > iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > /*
> > * For an unknown reason, when we use the mode "10" (write
> > * conversion register), the interrupt doesn't occur every time.
> > - * So we just wait 1 ms.
> > + * So we just wait the maximum conversion time and deliver
> > the value.
> > */
> > - mdelay(1);
> > + ret = max1027_wait_eoc(indio_dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
>
> I'm a bit confused here... Why are we looking at the active_scan_mask?
> Aren't we preventing this for running concurrently with buffering?
Sorry for the confusion, at this stage the "if (active_masks)" is
useless, I moved it later in the series when we actually start to use
this EOC helper for the buffered reads as well.
Thanks,
Miquèl
