> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:12 PM
> To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>; Lars-Peter Clausen
> <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-
> iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Miquel Raynal
> <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH 10/16] iio: adc: max1027: Prevent single channel
> accesses during buffer reads
>
> [External]
>
> When hardware buffers are enabled (the cnvst pin being the trigger),
> one
> should not mess with the device state by requesting a single channel
> read. Prevent it with a iio_buffer_enabled() check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> index 223c9e4abd86..83526f3d7d3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,8 @@ static int max1027_read_raw(struct iio_dev
> *indio_dev,
>
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> + if (iio_buffer_enabled(indio_dev))
> + return -EBUSY;
I guess 'iio_device_claim_direct_mode()' would be a better option
here? There's nothing preventing this check to pass and then, concurrently
someone enables the buffer...
- Nuno Sá
> ret = max1027_read_single_value(indio_dev, chan,
> val);
> break;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> --
> 2.27.0
