On Sun, 11 Jul 2021 11:20:39 +0100 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 13:36:37 +0200 > Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Read voltage_now via IIO and provide the property. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > Huh? Seems unlikely it pointed out that this patch was necessary in general. > If highlighting a particular fix in an earlier version, then state what it was > in the commit message. Note for fixes that get rolled into patches, it's > often just mentioned in the change log and we skip the tag because it can > cause confusion. > The robot found a problem in v1 (missing depends on IIO). It is fixed now. The message from the bot tells to add a tag. It seems not to make sense. But probably the bot is also running on public branches (which will not be rebase) and uses the same message where it actually makes sense. I will send a v3 with that tag removed and the other comment addressed. Regards, Andreas