On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:16:38 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Em Sun, 16 May 2021 17:21:03 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The devm_ handled runtime pm disable calls pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend()
> > which isn't balancing a matching get call. It isn't a bug as such,
> > because the runtime pm core doesn't decrement the reference count below
> > zero, but it is missleading so let's drop it.
> >
> > Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() new call makes it easy to handle
> > failures in resume as it doesn't hold a reference count if it exits
> > with an error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> LGTM.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Applied.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/pressure/icp10100.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/icp10100.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/icp10100.c
> > index 48759fc4bf18..af4621eaa6b5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/icp10100.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/icp10100.c
> > @@ -250,7 +250,9 @@ static int icp10100_get_measures(struct icp10100_state *st,
> > __be16 measures[3];
> > int ret;
> >
> > - pm_runtime_get_sync(&st->client->dev);
> > + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&st->client->dev);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> > cmd = &icp10100_cmd_measure[st->mode];
> > @@ -525,7 +527,6 @@ static void icp10100_pm_disable(void *data)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = data;
> >
> > - pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev);
> > pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> > }
> >
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
