On Thu, 03 Jun 2021 12:34:28 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 20:25 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:58:15 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It looks to me as though %#<foo> is relatively commonly misused in the kernel. > > > > > > Pehaps for the decimal portion of the format, checkpatch could have some > > > test for use of non-standard lengths. > > > > > > Given the use is generally meant for a u8, u16, u32, or u64, perhaps > > > checkpatch should emit a warning whenever the length is not 4, 6, 10, or 18. > > > > Would have saved me some trouble, so I'm definitely in favour of checkpatch > > catching this. > > > > I wonder if a better option is to match on 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 as likely to be > > caused by people getting the usage wrong rather than a deliberate attempt > > to pretty print something a little unusual? > > Dunno. %#0x and %x[123] seems pretty silly as it'll always emit the number > of digits in the value. Good point for those two cases - definitely want to catch them. > > There aren't too many other odd uses other than those. Perhaps you are right - after all anyone who is deliberately doing something unusual will know they are doing it and can ignore the checkpatch warning. Not as though it's going to happen very often from your stats below - looks like maybe 17 of those cases 'might' be deliberate. Jonathan > > > > $ git grep -P -h -o '%#\d+\w+' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn > > 8 and 16 are perhaps commonly misused. > > > 392 %#08x > > > 17 %#08lx > > > 9 %#08zx > > > 6 %#8x > > > 4 %#08llx > > > 1 %#8lx > > > 1 %#08 > > > > 7 %#16llx > > > 5 %#16 > > > 4 %#016Lx > > > 1 %#16x > > > 1 %#16lx > > These are the odd ones: > > > > 144 %#02x > > > 27 %#0x > > > 23 %#2x > > > 17 %#3lx > > > 15 %#3x > > > 14 %#03x > > > 6 %#012llx > > > 4 %#05x > > > 4 %#02X > > > 3 %#01x > > > 2 %#09x > > > 2 %#05lx > > > 1 %#5x > > > 1 %#5lx > > > 1 %#2Lx > > > 1 %#2llx > > > 1 %#12x > > > 1 %#0lx > > > 1 %#05llx > > > 1 %#03X > >
