On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 8:14 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @Linus, for IIO stuff, please put a cover letter on series as it makes it > easier for people to reply with things like this OK sorry about that, I'll try to keep it in mind. > and still let me use b4 > without manual tweaking. b4 only need the patches to be sent in a thread which I actually did, at least this works fine for me from here: tmp]$ b4 am -t 20210518230722.522446-1-linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210518230722.522446-1-linus.walleij%40linaro.org Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/linux-iio Analyzing 7 messages in the thread --- Writing ./v3_20210519_linus_walleij_iio_st_sensors_create_extended_attr_macro.mbx ✓ [PATCH 1/5 v3] iio: st_sensors: Create extended attr macro + Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> (✓ DKIM/redhat.com) ✓ [PATCH 2/5 v3] iio: accel: st_sensors: Support generic mounting matrix ✓ [PATCH 3/5 v3] iio: accel: st_sensors: Stop copying channels ✓ [PATCH 4/5 v3] iio: magnetometer: st_magn: Support mount matrix ✓ [PATCH 5/5 v3] iio: gyro: st_gyro: Support mount matrix --- ✓ Attestation-by: DKIM/linaro.org (From: linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx) --- Total patches: 5 --- Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210518230722.522446-1-linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx Base: not found git am ./v3_20210519_linus_walleij_iio_st_sensors_create_extended_attr_macro.mbx But I guess that without a 00/nn it is maybe not as clear if a series was sent as a thread. Yours, Linus Walleij
