From: Qi Teng <tq17373059@xxxxxxxxxxx> The variable st->r1_mod is checked in: if (st->r0_fract && st->r1_mod) This indicates that st->r1_mod can be zero. Its value is the same as that in: st->r0_fract = do_div(tmp, st->r1_mod); However, st->r1_mod performs as a divisor in this statement, which implies a possible divided-by-zero bug. To fix this possible bug, st->r1_mod is checked before the division operation. If it is zero, st->r0_fract is set to zero instead of do_div(tmp, st->r1_mod). Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Qi Teng <tq17373059@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c b/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c index 99c6f260cc21..1462a6a5bc6d 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c +++ b/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c @@ -182,10 +182,7 @@ static int adf4350_set_freq(struct adf4350_state *st, unsigned long long freq) tmp = freq * (u64)st->r1_mod + (st->fpfd >> 1); do_div(tmp, st->fpfd); /* Div round closest (n + d/2)/d */ - if (st->r1_mod) - st->r0_fract = do_div(tmp, st->r1_mod); - else - st->r0_fract = 0; + st->r0_fract = do_div(tmp, st->r1_mod); st->r0_int = tmp; } while (mdiv > st->r0_int); -- 2.25.1