On Tue, 18 May 2021 17:27:07 +0800 tangbin <tangbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Dan： > > On 2021/5/18 15:52, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:00:06PM +0800, Tang Bin wrote: > >> @@ -730,11 +730,7 @@ static int ad7746_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > >> if (ret < 0) > >> return ret; > >> > >> - ret = devm_iio_device_register(indio_dev->dev.parent, indio_dev); > >> - if (ret) > >> - return ret; > >> - > >> - return 0; > >> + return devm_iio_device_register(indio_dev->dev.parent, indio_dev); > >> } > > This sort of thing is done deliberately as a style choice... I probably > > wouldn't have written it that way myself, but there really isn't a > > downside to leaving it as-is. > > > > The unused "int ret = 0;" just introduces a static checker warning about > > unused assignments and disables the static checker warning for > > uninitialized variables so we want to remove that. > > > Got it, I will send this patch for you. I fall a bit different on this and would consider the above a cleanup though one I'd prefer to get with more significant stuff rather than on it's own. However, there is already a patch in revision that includes the same change from Lucas Stankus. > > Thanks > > Tang Bin > > >
