Em Sun, 9 May 2021 12:33:43 +0100 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Found using coccicheck script under review at: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210427141946.2478411-1-Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxxx/ > > This is a prequel to taking a closer look at the runtime pm in IIO drivers > in general. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> This driver has an extra (unbalanced?) call to pm_runtime_put_noidle() at ads1015_remove(). > --- > drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c > index 9fef39bcf997..4b61ee3d2501 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c > @@ -323,9 +323,7 @@ static int ads1015_set_power_state(struct ads1015_data *data, bool on) > struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(data->regmap); > > if (on) { > - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > - if (ret < 0) > - pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); > + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev); > } else { > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev); > ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev); Thanks, Mauro
