On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 17:12, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 May 2021 10:18:23 +0300
> Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > This change fixes a corner-case, where the returned voltage is actually
> > zero. This is also what patch ab0afa65bbc7 ("staging: iio: adc: ad7192:
> > fail probe on get_voltage") was trying to do.
> >
> > But as Jonathan pointed out, a zero-value would signal that the probe has
> > succeeded, putting the driver is a semi-initialized state.
> >
> > Fixes: ab0afa65bbc7 ("staging: iio: adc: ad7192: fail probe on get_voltage")
> > Cc: Alexandru Tachici <alexandru.tachici@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Given that voltage_uv == 1 would result in a situation no worse than
> for voltage_uv == 0 perhaps we should just change the following condition to
>
> if (voltage_uv >= 0) ?
hmmm, you're right;
i think had some narrow vision about this;
will send a v3
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> > index d3be67aa0522..79df54e0dc96 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> > @@ -950,6 +950,11 @@ static int ad7192_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > }
> >
> > voltage_uv = regulator_get_voltage(st->avdd);
> > + if (voltage_uv == 0) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + dev_err(&spi->dev, "Zero value provided for AVdd supply\n");
> > + goto error_disable_avdd;
> > + }
> >
> > if (voltage_uv > 0) {
> > st->int_vref_mv = voltage_uv / 1000;
>
