On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 12:28:40PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:43 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > With CONFIG_ACPI=n and -Werror, 0-day reports: > > > > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_i2c.c:46:36: error: > > 'bme680_acpi_match' defined but not used > > > > Apparently BME0680 is not a valid ACPI ID. Remove it and with it > > ACPI support from the bme680_i2c driver. > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > > with the SPI part amended in the same way. > Right. I just sent a patch doing that. Oddly enough 0-day didn't complain about that one to me, nor about many other drivers with the same problem. No idea how it decides if and when to make noise. Is there a way to determine invalid ACPI IDs ? I could write a coccinelle script to remove the code automatically. Thanks, Guenter