On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:34 AM Mugilraj Dhavachelvan <dmugil2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Use devm_iio_device_register() to avoid remove function and > drop explicit call to iio_device_unregister(). > > Signed-off-by: Mugilraj Dhavachelvan <dmugil2000@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/iio/dac/max517.c | 9 +-------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/max517.c b/drivers/iio/dac/max517.c > index 7e01838ef4d0..5f72f126162d 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/dac/max517.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/max517.c > @@ -189,13 +189,7 @@ static int max517_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > data->vref_mv[chan] = platform_data->vref_mv[chan]; > } > > - return iio_device_register(indio_dev); > -} > - In this case you can also remove the line with i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev); A lot of times, when functions like i2c_get_clientdata() get removed, the i2c_set_clientdata() function becomes useless. i.e. it stores some data that will never be used in the lifetime of the driver. It isn't always the case that you can do that; so, some care must be taken to avoid special cases. But in this case, you can remove the i2c_set_clientdata() call. > -static int max517_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > -{ > - iio_device_unregister(i2c_get_clientdata(client)); > - return 0; > + return devm_iio_device_register(&client->dev, indio_dev); > } > > static const struct i2c_device_id max517_id[] = { > @@ -214,7 +208,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver max517_driver = { > .pm = &max517_pm_ops, > }, > .probe = max517_probe, > - .remove = max517_remove, > .id_table = max517_id, > }; > module_i2c_driver(max517_driver); > -- > 2.25.1 >