On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 07:48:41PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 04:28:42 +0000 > Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:30:37AM -0800, Jyoti Bhayana wrote: > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > > > Thanks for the detailed and careful review of this patch. Good to hear > > > that v7 is not required. Please find below answers to your > > > questions. Looking forward to seeing this patch merged in the next > > > cycle. Thanks for your help in making this happen. > > > > > > > Any update on this ? Please share the branch with is patch so that I > > can pull and ask Cristian to make his changes on top. > Running a bit behind at the moment. > No worries. > Anyhow, there should now be an ib-iio-scmi-5.12-rc1 branch > on https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git > Thanks > Includes making the various long long local variables explicitly > s64 and u64 as relevant. > > Based on the rc1 that eats babies so handle with care :) > 😁 > I've also merge this into the togreg branch of iio.git. > As explained above that wasn't entirely trivial so Jyoti > please take a quick look and check that changes are fine. > Pushed out as testing to let the autobuilders poke at it. > Assuming they don't find anything, it should be fine > for Sudeep to merge that ib and everything will unwind > nicely in Linus' tree next cycle. > Hope so. > There is a bit of an ongoing discussion of an earlier patch > in the IIO tree, so I might end up redoing this merge > if I need to rebase to sort that out, but I'll make sure > the diff is the same (git ID might change). > I can wait for a week or 2 if you think things will settle down by then. We can avoid 2 different git IDs if possible. The main intention was to give some reference to Cristian to rebase/post his series. I am all fine to wait for a week or 2 for final branch. -- Regards, Sudeep
