Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: Add basic unit test for iio_format_value()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:45:02 +0100
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 1/2/21 3:59 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > On 12/29/20 7:16 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:  
> >> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:17:43 +0100
> >> Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>  
> >>> The IIO core provides a function to do formatting of fixedpoint 
> >>> numbers.
> >>>
> >>> In the past there have been some issues with the implementation of the
> >>> function where for example negative numbers were not handled correctly.
> >>>
> >>> Introduce a basic unit test based on kunit that tests the function and
> >>> ensures that the generated output matches the expected output.
> >>>
> >>> This gives us some confidence that future modifications to the function
> >>> implementation will not break ABI compatibility.
> >>>
> >>> To run the unit tests follow the kunit documentation and add
> >>>
> >>>    CONFIG_IIO=y
> >>>    CONFIG_IIO_TEST_FORMAT=y
> >>>
> >>> to the .kunitconfig and run
> >>>
> >>>    > ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
> >>>    Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
> >>>    Building KUnit Kernel ...
> >>>    Starting KUnit Kernel ...
> >>> ============================================================
> >>>    ======== [PASSED] iio-format ========
> >>>    [PASSED] iio_test_iio_format_value_integer
> >>>    [PASSED] iio_test_iio_format_value_fixedpoint
> >>>    [PASSED] iio_test_iio_format_value_fractional
> >>>    [PASSED] iio_test_iio_format_value_fractional_log2
> >>>    [PASSED] iio_test_iio_format_value_multiple
> >>> ============================================================
> >>>    Testing complete. 21 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
> >>>    Elapsed time: 8.242s total, 0.001s configuring, 3.865s building, 
> >>> 0.000s running
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>  
> >> Series looks good to me, but I wonder.  What is convention wrt to
> >> MAINTAINERS / Acks etc for self tests?  
> >
> > Let's ask Brendan.
> >  
> Jonathan, since there hasn't been any additional feedback should we just 
> apply this series?
> 
Sure, it's been long enough.

Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
all the normal reasons.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> Thanks,
> 
> - Lars
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux