Re: [PATCH v2] iio: common: st_sensors: fix possible infinite loop in st_sensors_irq_thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat,  5 Dec 2020 11:10:41 +0100
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Return a boolean value in st_sensors_new_samples_available routine in
> order to avoid an infinite loop in st_sensors_irq_thread if
> stat_drdy.addr is not defined or stat_drdy read fails
> 
> Fixes: 90efe05562921 ("iio: st_sensors: harden interrupt handling")
> Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Oops. I should not noticed this and replied here.
See reply to previous version.  I think this will create an infinite
loop in the obscure case of no status register + an edge interrupt.
My gut feeling is we can't support that combination so should fail
at probe time if it is specified.  It's broken hardware / dt.

Jonathan

> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - return true if the sensor does not have stat_drdy register
> ---
>  .../common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c    | 20 ++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c
> index 0507283bd4c1..d3f047e9d778 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c
> @@ -23,35 +23,31 @@
>   * @sdata: Sensor data.
>   *
>   * returns:
> - * 0 - no new samples available
> - * 1 - new samples available
> - * negative - error or unknown
> + * false - no new samples available or read error
> + * true - new samples available
>   */
> -static int st_sensors_new_samples_available(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> -					    struct st_sensor_data *sdata)
> +static bool st_sensors_new_samples_available(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> +					     struct st_sensor_data *sdata)
>  {
>  	int ret, status;
>  
>  	/* How would I know if I can't check it? */
>  	if (!sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.addr)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		return true;
>  
>  	/* No scan mask, no interrupt */
>  	if (!indio_dev->active_scan_mask)
> -		return 0;
> +		return false;
>  
>  	ret = regmap_read(sdata->regmap,
>  			  sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.addr,
>  			  &status);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(sdata->dev, "error checking samples available\n");
> -		return ret;
> +		return false;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (status & sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.mask)
> -		return 1;
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return !!(status & sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.mask);
>  }
>  
>  /**




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux