On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 12:27 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Even better to use FIELD_GET > which does what Bjorn suggested under the hood. I didn't even know of the existence of that thing, and I was still looking and scouting around for something like it. I'll rewrite the thingie using FIELD_GET, no problem! Yours, Linus Walleij
