On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 00:14:59 +0530 Vaishnav M A <vaishnav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch aims to add i2c_device_id for the > vcnl4035 driver, while going through the initial driver > submission patches, noticed that the i2c_device_id was removed > on suggestion (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/970970/), > will it be possible to consider this patch add the i2c_device_id, > so that the device can be instantiated using i2c_new_client_device > or say from the userspace?.This will be really helpful in cases > where the device tree based description is not possible now(Eg. > a device on a gbphy i2c adapter created by greybus). > > The particular usecase here is described over this RFC Patch > for the mikroBUS driver: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1290148/ > > Thanks and Regards, > > Vaishnav M A If you send out a v2 of a patch without there having been any replies please reply your self to say you have done so. That avoids reviewers looking at the wrong version! Thanks Jonathan > > Signed-off-by: Vaishnav M A <vaishnav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c > index 765c44adac57..73a28e30dddc 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c > @@ -652,6 +652,12 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops vcnl4035_pm_ops = { > vcnl4035_runtime_resume, NULL) > }; > > +static const struct i2c_device_id vcnl4035_id[] = { > + { "vcnl4035", 0}, > + { } > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, vcnl4035_id); > + > static const struct of_device_id vcnl4035_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "vishay,vcnl4035", }, > { } > @@ -666,6 +672,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver vcnl4035_driver = { > }, > .probe = vcnl4035_probe, > .remove = vcnl4035_remove, > + .id_table = vcnl4035_id, > }; > > module_i2c_driver(vcnl4035_driver);
