On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Classic being the maintainer problem, is that there is no one specific to pester > when you can't get reviews on your own patches. Hence if anyone has some > time I'd appreciate sanity checks on: > > [PATCH 2/3] iio: Add __printf() attributes to various allocation functions > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20200913132115.800131-3-jic23@xxxxxxxxxx/ > Examples show that rather static __printf() for the first occurrence. Otherwise the entire list of these patches LGTM. You may put my Rb tag. > [PATCH 3/3] iio:core: Tidy up kernel-doc. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20200913132115.800131-4-jic23@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > [PATCH] iio:magn:hmc5843: Fix passing true where iio_shared_by enum required. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20200913112546.715624-1-jic23@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > [PATCH] iio:accel:bma180: Fix use of true when should be iio_shared_by enum > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20200913121227.764626-1-jic23@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > For those last 2 I forgot I'd previously sent effectively the same fixes out > earlier in the year but didn't get any reviews then either :( > > Note I've randomly picked a few people who have done reviews or posted a lot > of patches recently for the cc list. I'm more than happy if anyone else > wants to join in with the fun :) Reviews are always appreciated for any > code submitted to IIO from anyone. If you are unsure about something in > a review, it is fine to say so. Hence even relatively new people can > offer great value. We all started somewhere! > > Thanks, > > Jonathan -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
