Hi All, Classic being the maintainer problem, is that there is no one specific to pester when you can't get reviews on your own patches. Hence if anyone has some time I'd appreciate sanity checks on: [PATCH 2/3] iio: Add __printf() attributes to various allocation functions https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20200913132115.800131-3-jic23@xxxxxxxxxx/ [PATCH 3/3] iio:core: Tidy up kernel-doc. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20200913132115.800131-4-jic23@xxxxxxxxxx/ [PATCH] iio:magn:hmc5843: Fix passing true where iio_shared_by enum required. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20200913112546.715624-1-jic23@xxxxxxxxxx/ [PATCH] iio:accel:bma180: Fix use of true when should be iio_shared_by enum https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20200913121227.764626-1-jic23@xxxxxxxxxx/ For those last 2 I forgot I'd previously sent effectively the same fixes out earlier in the year but didn't get any reviews then either :( Note I've randomly picked a few people who have done reviews or posted a lot of patches recently for the cc list. I'm more than happy if anyone else wants to join in with the fun :) Reviews are always appreciated for any code submitted to IIO from anyone. If you are unsure about something in a review, it is fine to say so. Hence even relatively new people can offer great value. We all started somewhere! Thanks, Jonathan
