On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:22:21 +0300 Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The proper error code should be ENODEV (vs EINVAL) in case the chip ID > isn't recognized. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied. Thanks, Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c > index 1e8fd83b9bc2..8a6682b567be 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c > @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int ad9467_setup(struct ad9467_state *st, unsigned int chip_id) > AN877_ADC_OUTPUT_MODE_TWOS_COMPLEMENT; > return 0; > default: > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENODEV; > } > } >
