[PATCH] iio: adc: ad9467: return ENODEV vs EINVAL in ad9467_setup()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The proper error code should be ENODEV (vs EINVAL) in case the chip ID
isn't recognized.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
index 1e8fd83b9bc2..8a6682b567be 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int ad9467_setup(struct ad9467_state *st, unsigned int chip_id)
 				  AN877_ADC_OUTPUT_MODE_TWOS_COMPLEMENT;
 		return 0;
 	default:
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux