On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 3:10 PM Crt Mori <cmo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Since the second patch is dependent on the first and was still not > merged, I have decided to send them together. First patch just makes > second one more readable as it splits out the repeated calculation and > that enables the second patch to tweak the variable to the new > condition. So, we are closer, but here is one remark, it's not good to send a new version if you are not going to address _all_ comments (it's fine to do, but you need to answer first why you are not going to satisfy them). For example, explicit castings here and there, voodoo arithmetics is left uncommented. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
