On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:09:07PM +0200, Fabrizio Benedetti wrote: > This patch replace udelay with usleep_range > according to the Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt . > The usleep_range have a range that is >= of udelay. > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Benedetti <fabrizio.benedetti.82@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c > index eeeeec97ad27..4a67a660bb17 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void reset(struct fbtft_par *par) > dev_dbg(par->info->device, "%s()\n", __func__); > > gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.reset, 0); > - udelay(20); > + usleep_range(20, 25); And are you sure that 25 is ok here? Unless you have the hardware, don't make up random numbers for things like delays :) Also, be sure you use the correct mailing lists, why did you ignore the output of scripts/get_maintainer.pl for this patch? thanks, greg k-h
