On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:30:03 +0200 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On 12/07/2020 14:35:34+0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 13:43:42 +0200 > > Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Here is a new counter driver to support Microchip TCB capture devices. > > > > > > Each SoC has two TCB blocks, each one including three independent > > > channels.The following series adds support for two counter modes: > > > increase and quadrature decoder. > > > > > > As for the atmel clocksource and pwm, the counter driver needs to fill > > > some tcb capabilities in order to operate with the right configuration. > > > This is achieved in first patch of this series. > > > > > > Please feel free to comment. > > > > As far as I can see we have all the necessary acks etc and it looks > > good to me as well. > > > > Shall I do an immutable branch with the whole lot or should we split it > > up? Patches 1 and 5 need to go through the same tree, but bindings > > could go via another route. I'm also fine if the whole lot goes > > via the appropriate soc tree if that is easier. > > > > I think the best would be an immutable branch as I have another series > that depends on the three preliminary patches that should go through the > clocksource/tip tree this cycle: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200710230813.1005150-1-alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx/ I've pushed applied the patches to an immutable branch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git/log/?h=ib-5.8-tcb and merged that into the togreg branch of iio.git which is pushed out as testing or the autobuilders to play with it. Thanks, Jonathan > >
