Hello Jonathan,
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 05:29:16PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 21:44:05 +0200
> Ondrej Jirman <megous@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > The STK3311 chip has a variant called STK3311-X, which has a different
> > chip id of 0x12.
> >
> > Add the chip id to the driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megous@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Given this is clearly not quite compatible with the stk3311 probably
> best to also add a an id to the of id table. Any idea what else
> is different?
I've looked at it more, and there's no stk3311 either. It always has
some suffix, like -sa -9 -a -wv -x, .... So I don't think a new
ID in the table is neccessary. The driver can differentiate based on
chip id, in case it will ever become necessary.
regards,
o.
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/light/stk3310.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/stk3310.c b/drivers/iio/light/stk3310.c
> > index 185c24a75ae6..1a8401d198a4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/light/stk3310.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/stk3310.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> >
> > #define STK3310_CHIP_ID_VAL 0x13
> > #define STK3311_CHIP_ID_VAL 0x1D
> > +#define STK3311X_CHIP_ID_VAL 0x12
> > #define STK3335_CHIP_ID_VAL 0x51
> > #define STK3310_PSINT_EN 0x01
> > #define STK3310_PS_MAX_VAL 0xFFFF
> > @@ -453,6 +454,7 @@ static int stk3310_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >
> > if (chipid != STK3310_CHIP_ID_VAL &&
> > chipid != STK3311_CHIP_ID_VAL &&
> > + chipid != STK3311X_CHIP_ID_VAL &&
> > chipid != STK3335_CHIP_ID_VAL) {
> > dev_err(&client->dev, "invalid chip id: 0x%x\n", chipid);
> > return -ENODEV;
>
