On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:53:53 +0100 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > > One of a class of bugs pointed out by Lars in a recent review. > iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp assumes the buffer used is aligned > to the size of the timestamp (8 bytes). This is not guaranteed in > this driver which uses an array of smaller elements on the stack. > As Lars also noted this anti pattern can involve a leak of data to > userspace and that indeed can happen here. We close both issues by > moving to a suitable structure in the iio_priv() data. > This data is allocated with kzalloc so no data can leak > apart from previous readings. > > Explicit alignment of ts needed to ensure consistent padding > on all architectures (particularly x86_32 with it's 4 byte alignment > of s64) > > Fixes: e4a70e3e7d84 ("iio: humidity: add support to hts221 rh/temp combo device") > Reported-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git and marked for stable. I'm scooping up all the ones in this series for which I have an ack so that we can focus on getting remainder reviewed. Thanks, Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/humidity/hts221.h | 7 +++++-- > drivers/iio/humidity/hts221_buffer.c | 9 +++++---- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221.h b/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221.h > index 7c650df77556..721359e226cb 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221.h > +++ b/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221.h > @@ -14,8 +14,6 @@ > > #include <linux/iio/iio.h> > > -#define HTS221_DATA_SIZE 2 > - > enum hts221_sensor_type { > HTS221_SENSOR_H, > HTS221_SENSOR_T, > @@ -39,6 +37,11 @@ struct hts221_hw { > > bool enabled; > u8 odr; > + /* Ensure natural alignment of timestamp */ > + struct { > + __le16 channels[2]; > + s64 ts __aligned(8); > + } scan; > }; > > extern const struct dev_pm_ops hts221_pm_ops; > diff --git a/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221_buffer.c > index 21c6c160462d..59ede9860185 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221_buffer.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221_buffer.c > @@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ static const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops hts221_buffer_ops = { > > static irqreturn_t hts221_buffer_handler_thread(int irq, void *p) > { > - u8 buffer[ALIGN(2 * HTS221_DATA_SIZE, sizeof(s64)) + sizeof(s64)]; > struct iio_poll_func *pf = p; > struct iio_dev *iio_dev = pf->indio_dev; > struct hts221_hw *hw = iio_priv(iio_dev); > @@ -170,18 +169,20 @@ static irqreturn_t hts221_buffer_handler_thread(int irq, void *p) > /* humidity data */ > ch = &iio_dev->channels[HTS221_SENSOR_H]; > err = regmap_bulk_read(hw->regmap, ch->address, > - buffer, HTS221_DATA_SIZE); > + &hw->scan.channels[0], > + sizeof(hw->scan.channels[0])); > if (err < 0) > goto out; > > /* temperature data */ > ch = &iio_dev->channels[HTS221_SENSOR_T]; > err = regmap_bulk_read(hw->regmap, ch->address, > - buffer + HTS221_DATA_SIZE, HTS221_DATA_SIZE); > + &hw->scan.channels[1], > + sizeof(hw->scan.channels[1])); > if (err < 0) > goto out; > > - iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(iio_dev, buffer, > + iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(iio_dev, &hw->scan, > iio_get_time_ns(iio_dev)); > > out: