Re: [PATCH] iio: st_sensors: rely on odr mask to know if odr can be set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu,  2 Apr 2020 15:40:59 +0200 (CEST)
yarl-baudig@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Indeed, relying on addr being not 0 cannot work because some device have
> their register to set odr at address 0. As a matter of fact, if the odr
> can be set, then there is a mask.

Hi Lary,

Which sensor has ODR in the register at address 0?

I see it's a few of the magnetometers from a quick grep, but please state
it in the cover letter.  Also please add a suitable Fixes tag
as we will want this backported if appropriate.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> Signed-off-by: Lary Gibaud <yarl-baudig@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> index a0c2cbd60c6f..cccd4c26dfa4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int st_sensors_set_odr(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int odr)
>  	struct st_sensor_odr_avl odr_out = {0, 0};
>  	struct st_sensor_data *sdata = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
> -	if (!sdata->sensor_settings->odr.addr)
> +	if (!sdata->sensor_settings->odr.mask)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	err = st_sensors_match_odr(sdata->sensor_settings, odr, &odr_out);




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux