On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 11:28:52 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 2:49 AM Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 01:44:20 +0200 > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 9:57 PM Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Current implementation of the function ad7192_get_available_filter_freq > > > > repeats calculation of output data rate a few times. We can simplify > > > > these steps by refactoring out the calculation of fADC. This would also > > > > addresses the checkpatch warning of line exceeding 80 character. > > > > > > I'm not sure you did an equivalent changes. I believe in the original > > > code precision is better. Consider low clock frequencies when 10 bit > > > right shift may hide some bits of the division. > > > > Note that those bits are eventually "hidden" in the same way later, > > Even if mathematically (arithmetically) evaluation is correct, we have > to remember that computers are bad with floating point and especially > kernel, which uses integer arithmetic. That said, it's easy to get > off-by-one error (due to precision lost) if we do big division before > (not so big) multiplication. That's exactly the point I was trying to explain below: swapping steps in a sequence of DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() (*not* of arithmetic divisions), *should* not affect quantisation ("off-by-one") error. I'm not entirely sure in this case, so a quick "demonstration" in Python or suchlike as you suggested would be nice to have, indeed. > > despite the different sequence, due to DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() being used > > at every step (both before and after the change) without other > > operations occurring. > > By the way, where AD7192_SINC3_FILTER and AD7192_SINC4_FILTER > multiplications disappear and why? Those were in fact divisions (multiplications of the divisor). Overall, these steps are now arranged in a way closer to how they are presented in the datasheet mentioned here (up to "Chop Enabled" paragraph, page 26). -- Stefano