On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 04:28:10PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:38:52 +0200 > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Since we have access to the struct device_driver and thus to the ID table, > > there is no need to supply special parameters to st_sensors_of_name_probe(). > > > > Besides that we have a common API to get driver match data, there is > > no need to do matching separately for OF and ACPI. > > > > Taking into consideration above, simplify the ST sensors code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > This looks good to me, but its big enough that purely on that basis I'd > like to leave it a little longer to let Denis / Lorezo or someone else have time > to take a look. > > If I seem to have lost it by the end of the first week in January, give > me a poke. I may have drunk a few things before then ;) Gentle ping. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
