On 10.01.2020 15:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On 08/01/2020 14:55:10+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote: >> Add microchip,<chip>-tcb to DT bindings documentation. This is for >> microchip,sam9x60-tcb. >> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt | 5 +++-- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt >> index c4a83e364cb6..e1713e41f6e0 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt >> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ >> * Device tree bindings for Atmel Timer Counter Blocks >> -- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "simple-mfd", "syscon". >> - <chip> can be "at91rm9200" or "at91sam9x5" >> +- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "microchip,<chip>-tcb", >> + "simple-mfd", "syscon". >> + <chip> can be "at91rm9200", "at91sam9x5" or "sam9x60" > > atmel,sam9x60-tcb, microchip,at91rm9200-tcb and microchip,at91sam9x5-tcb > are not allowed and the documentation should reflect that. OK! I'll double check it. > > It would probably be easier to do that on top of the yaml conversion > here: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191009224006.5021-2-alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx/ I don't see this integrated in next-20200110. Am I looking at the wrong branch? > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com >
