On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:05:41 +0100
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At the moment, attempting to probe a device with ST_LSM6DS3_ID
> (e.g. using the st,lsm6ds3 compatible) fails with:
>
> st_lsm6dsx_i2c 1-006b: unsupported whoami [69]
>
> ... even though 0x69 is the whoami listed for ST_LSM6DS3_ID.
>
> This happens because st_lsm6dsx_check_whoami() also attempts
> to match unspecified (zero-initialized) entries in the "id" array.
> ST_LSM6DS3_ID = 0 will therefore match any entry in
> st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings (here: the first), because none of them
> actually have all 12 entries listed in the "id" array.
>
> Avoid this by additionally checking if "name" is set,
> which is only set for valid entries in the "id" array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Definitely sounds like this wants backporting.
If you can figure out a fixes tag that would be great!
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> index a7d40c02ce6b..b921dd9e108f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> @@ -1301,7 +1301,8 @@ static int st_lsm6dsx_check_whoami(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw, int id,
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings); i++) {
> for (j = 0; j < ST_LSM6DSX_MAX_ID; j++) {
> - if (id == st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings[i].id[j].hw_id)
> + if (st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings[i].id[j].name &&
> + id == st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings[i].id[j].hw_id)
> break;
> }
> if (j < ST_LSM6DSX_MAX_ID)
