>
> > > > > > LSM9DS1 does not support hw FIFO for the moment. Are you trying to enable
> > > > > > buffered reading?
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not manually interacting with the device at all when this
> > > > > exception occurs. This happens during the driver probe.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Could you please try if the following patch helps? (just compiled)
> > > > >
> > > > > I no longer receive the exception with this patch and it makes sense, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Bobby,
> > > >
> > > > thx a lot for testing. Could you please try to drop the previous patch and
> > > > apply the following one? Does it fix the issue as well?
> > >
> > > No problem, happy to help. I just tested, and unfortunately the issue
> > > is still present with this patch.
> >
> > re-looking at the code this patch will actually does not anything since in the
> > current implementation st_lsm6dsx_handler_irq will return IRQ_NONE and the
> > thread handler will not be run. Anyway since st_lsm6dsx_handler_irq will be
> > removed soon I will respin this patch ontop of Sean series.
> >
> > > I gave the datasheet and the hardware reference manual of the
> > > connected CPU a closer look and suspected a problem with my pin
> > > config. However even after various combinations of pull ups/downs and
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW/IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH the same exception occurs, so I
> > > don't think that there's an issue with pin config stopping the
> > > interrupt line from being deasserted.
> >
> > are you able to monitor the line activity through an oscilloscope?
> > The issue is the irq line is never asserted and the kernel complains about
> > lot of interrupts not managed
> >
> > Looking at the datasheet, LSM9DS1 does not support IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW.
> > ST_LSM6DSX_REG_HLACTIVE_ADDR and ST_LSM6DSX_REG_PP_OD_ADDR registers are
> > actually not defined for LSM9DS1 and I will move them in hw_settings map.
>
> The datasheet I have for the LSM9DS1 shows a HLACTIVE bit in the
> CTRL_REG8 (0x22) register, I thought that indicated support for both
> high and low IRQ types.
Yes, right. I will update the series. Looking at the datasheet even
the BDU register definition seems wrong. I will fix it as well.
> Either way, after applying your recent (Sep 22nd) patches to this
> driver and changing my device tree node I have no kernel exception and
> the iio device enumerates as normal. For anyone curious my device tree
> node is now:
>
What happen if you set the irq line active high? Does the issue occur?
Regards,
Lorenzo
> lsm9ds1_ag@6a {
> compatible = "st,lsm9ds1-imu";
> reg = <0x6a>;
> st,drdy-int-pin = <1>;
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_acc_gyro>;
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio7>;
> interrupts = <13 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> };
>
> >
> > @Jonathan: do you prefer this patch to be ontop of Sean's series?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lorenzo
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: check read_fifo pointer in st_lsm6dsx_handler_thread
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c | 3 +++
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> > > > index b0f3da1976e4..f4fd4842bd79 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> > > > @@ -666,6 +666,9 @@ static irqreturn_t st_lsm6dsx_handler_thread(int irq, void *private)
> > > > struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw = private;
> > > > int count;
> > > >
> > > > + if (!hw->settings->fifo_ops.read_fifo)
> > > > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > +
> > > > mutex_lock(&hw->fifo_lock);
> > > > count = hw->settings->fifo_ops.read_fifo(hw);
> > > > mutex_unlock(&hw->fifo_lock);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.21.0
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > For context I'm working with a board that has every data ready and
> > > > > interrupt signal connected to the LSM9DS1. Could you clarify what the
> > > > > proper usage of the "st,drdy-int-pin" would be in this case and
> > > > > whether or not I need more than one interrupt called out in my device
> > > > > tree node?
> > > > > I'm not really understanding how they're currently being utilized for
> > > > > this device in the driver.
> > > >
> > > > For the moment irq line in lsm9ds1 (acc/gyro) is not used at all,
> > > > so you can omit the "st,drdy-int-pin" property
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, I know support for this device was added recently and the combo
> > > > > device hardware FIFO is complex, but is support for this something
> > > > > that's currently being worked on?
> > > >
> > > > It is actually in my ToDo list but I have no this device at the moment, so
> > > > patches are welcome :)
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Lorenzo
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Bobby Jones
> > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Lorenzo
> > > > > >
> > > > > > iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: do not configure the fifo if not supported
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 2 +-
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > > > > > index b65a6ca775e0..90a0e5ce44e5 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > > > > > @@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, int hw_id,
> > > > > > return err;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - if (hw->irq > 0) {
> > > > > > + if (hw->irq > 0 && hw->settings->fifo_ops.update_fifo) {
> > > > > > err = st_lsm6dsx_fifo_setup(hw);
> > > > > > if (err < 0)
> > > > > > return err;
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.21.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
