>
>
> On 13/09/2019 10.27, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/09/2019 09.06, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> > > > This add ways for the SoC to wake from accelerometer wake events.
> > > >
> > > > In the suspend function we skip disabling the sensor if wakeup-source
> > > > and events are activated.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes since v4:
> > > > * More devices supports wakeup
> > > >
> > > > Changes since v5:
> > > > * None
> > > >
> > > > Changes since v6:
> > > > * None
> > > >
> > > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > > > index 4198ba263d03..f79978a2870f 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > > > @@ -1858,6 +1858,9 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, int hw_id,
> > > > return err;
> > > > }
> > > > + if (dev->of_node && of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "wakeup-source"))
> > > > + device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
> > > > +
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(st_lsm6dsx_probe);
> > > > @@ -1876,6 +1879,12 @@ static int __maybe_unused st_lsm6dsx_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > > if (!(hw->enable_mask & BIT(sensor->id)))
> > > > continue;
> > > > + if (device_may_wakeup(dev) && i == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC) {
> > > > + /* Enable wake from IRQ */
> > > > + enable_irq_wake(hw->irq);
> > > > + continue;
> >
> > I guess here we need even to check hw->event_enable, don't we?
> Good idea :)
>
> >
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > if (sensor->id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT0 ||
> > > > sensor->id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT1 ||
> > > > sensor->id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT2)
> > > > @@ -1908,6 +1917,11 @@ static int __maybe_unused st_lsm6dsx_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > > if (!(hw->suspend_mask & BIT(sensor->id)))
> > > > continue;
> > > > + if (device_may_wakeup(dev) && i == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC) {
> > > > + disable_irq_wake(hw->irq);
> > > > + continue;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > This section needs to move above:
> >
> > agree, and we probably do not need 'continue'. Moreover I guess we should check
> > hw->event_enable even here, right?
>
> Correct we don't need the 'continue' here... The 'hw->suspend_mask' is not
> set as we skip it in the resume part.
> I'll add the 'hw->enable_event' check here as well.
>
> Is there more stuff that blocks this series from your point of view?
Actually I have not tested, just compiled. Looking at the code seems fine.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> /Sean
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
