Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add wakeup-source option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 13/09/2019 10.27, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:


On 12/09/2019 09.06, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
This add ways for the SoC to wake from accelerometer wake events.

In the suspend function we skip disabling the sensor if wakeup-source
and events are activated.

Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v4:
   * More devices supports wakeup

Changes since v5:
   * None

Changes since v6:
   * None

   drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
index 4198ba263d03..f79978a2870f 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
@@ -1858,6 +1858,9 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, int hw_id,
   			return err;
   	}
+	if (dev->of_node && of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "wakeup-source"))
+		device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
+
   	return 0;
   }
   EXPORT_SYMBOL(st_lsm6dsx_probe);
@@ -1876,6 +1879,12 @@ static int __maybe_unused st_lsm6dsx_suspend(struct device *dev)
   		if (!(hw->enable_mask & BIT(sensor->id)))
   			continue;
+		if (device_may_wakeup(dev) && i == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC) {
+			/* Enable wake from IRQ */
+			enable_irq_wake(hw->irq);
+			continue;

I guess here we need even to check hw->event_enable, don't we?
Good idea :)


+		}
+
   		if (sensor->id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT0 ||
   		    sensor->id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT1 ||
   		    sensor->id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT2)
@@ -1908,6 +1917,11 @@ static int __maybe_unused st_lsm6dsx_resume(struct device *dev)
   		if (!(hw->suspend_mask & BIT(sensor->id)))
   			continue;
+		if (device_may_wakeup(dev) && i == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC) {
+			disable_irq_wake(hw->irq);
+			continue;
+		}
+
This section needs to move above:

agree, and we probably do not need 'continue'. Moreover I guess we should check
hw->event_enable even here, right?

Correct we don't need the 'continue' here... The 'hw->suspend_mask' is not set as we skip it in the resume part.
I'll add the 'hw->enable_event' check here as well.

Is there more stuff that blocks this series from your point of view?

/Sean



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux