On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:18:33 +0300 Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > One in two sample sets was lost by multiplying fifo_set_size with > sizeof(u16). Also, the double number of available samples were pushed to > the iio buffers. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks right to me. Will pick up once we've resolved the questions on patch 1. Thanks, Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c > index adec37b..72d3f45 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c > @@ -548,8 +548,7 @@ static irqreturn_t adxl372_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p) > goto err; > > /* Each sample is 2 bytes */ > - for (i = 0; i < fifo_entries * sizeof(u16); > - i += st->fifo_set_size * sizeof(u16)) > + for (i = 0; i < fifo_entries; i += st->fifo_set_size) > iio_push_to_buffers(indio_dev, &st->fifo_buf[i]); > } > err:
