On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 11:32:24 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 30.08.19 09:23, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > >> On 29.08.19 10:37, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > >>>> On 27.08.19 22:08, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 10:26:35 +0200 > > >>>>> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Get rid of invalid sensitivity value for LSM9DS1 gyro sensor > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Fixes: 687a60feb9c6 ("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add support for accel/gyro unit of lsm9ds1") > > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>>> The zero degree scale is certainly odd otherwise, so good to tidy > > >>>>> this up. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git. > > >>>>> > > > > > > [...] > > > > > >>> struct st_lsm6dsx_fs_table_entry in st_lsm6dsx_settings will always have 4 > > >>> elements for fs_avl array and since the array is defined as static the > > >>> uninitialized elements are set to 0. > > >>> > > >>> Could you please share the ops you are getting? > > >>> > > >> > > >> How this oops during startup can look like is appended below. I know > > >> that exactly this change causes it. Can you test this too please? > > > > > > I did it but I have no issues > > > > > >> > > >> Given the cleanup nature of this patch, I think it's best to revert it > > >> in case of any doubt. > > >> > > >> thanks, > > >> > > >> martin > > >> > > > > > > is it the full ops? It seems some parts are missing. > > > Are you running some userspace aps reading in_anglvel_scale_available or reading/writing in in_anglvel_scale? > > > Could you please double check if the following patch helps? (just compiled) > > > > > > > it does not, and you're right, the problem should be somewhere else. > > I've yet to debug it further. > > > > thanks, > > Looking at the previous patch I spotted an issue (not related to the one you > are facing)..actually we can set device gain to 0 forcing to 0 sensor output. > I will post a formal patch to fix it. > Rather than messing around with a pull request that has already gone to Greg, I'm going to leave this as it is for now. The trace doesn't make a lot of sense to me and whilst a bit messy (as fixed up by Lorenzo's follow up) I can't see why things would crash. So needs debugging and that isn't a problem given we are only looking at putting this support into rc1. Not ideal, but there is time to work out what is wrong and fix it up! Thanks, Jonathan > Regards, > Lorenzo > > > > > martin > > > >