In case the result is -0.3252 tmp0 is 0 after the div_s64_rem, so tmp0 is
non-negative which results in an output of 0.3252.
Fix this by explicitly handling the negative sign ourselves.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
* Support vals[0] >= and vals[1] < 0 in IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL
* Note: IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL is untested, as I lack hardware
* Note2: Currently IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL is only called with vals[1] from
in-kernel drivers AFAICS
drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
index 245b5844028d..247338142c87 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
@@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ static ssize_t __iio_format_value(char *buf, size_t len, unsigned int type,
{
unsigned long long tmp;
int tmp0, tmp1;
+ char *sign;
bool scale_db = false;
switch (type) {
@@ -593,11 +594,17 @@ static ssize_t __iio_format_value(char *buf, size_t len, unsigned int type,
tmp = div_s64((s64)vals[0] * 1000000000LL, vals[1]);
tmp1 = vals[1];
tmp0 = (int)div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000, &tmp1);
- return snprintf(buf, len, "%d.%09u", tmp0, abs(tmp1));
+ if (vals[1] < 0) {
+ sign = vals[0] >= 0 ? "-" : "";
+ } else {
+ sign = vals[0] < 0 ? "-" : "";
+ }
+ return snprintf(buf, len, "%s%u.%09u", sign, abs(tmp0), abs(tmp1));
case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2:
+ sign = vals[0] < 0 ? "-" : "";
tmp = shift_right((s64)vals[0] * 1000000000LL, vals[1]);
tmp0 = (int)div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000LL, &tmp1);
- return snprintf(buf, len, "%d.%09u", tmp0, abs(tmp1));
+ return snprintf(buf, len, "%s%u.%09u", sign, abs(tmp0), abs(tmp1));
case IIO_VAL_INT_MULTIPLE:
{
int i;
--
2.23.0
