[PATCH 1/1] iio: core: Fix fractional format generation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In case the result is -0.3252 tmp0 is 0 after the div_s64_rem, so tmp0 is
non-negative which results in an output of 0.3252.
Fix this by explicitly handling the negative sign ourselves.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
index 245b5844028d..18350c1959ae 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
@@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ static ssize_t __iio_format_value(char *buf, size_t len, unsigned int type,
 {
 	unsigned long long tmp;
 	int tmp0, tmp1;
+	const char *sign = vals[0] < 0 ? "-" : "";
 	bool scale_db = false;
 
 	switch (type) {
@@ -593,11 +594,11 @@ static ssize_t __iio_format_value(char *buf, size_t len, unsigned int type,
 		tmp = div_s64((s64)vals[0] * 1000000000LL, vals[1]);
 		tmp1 = vals[1];
 		tmp0 = (int)div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000, &tmp1);
-		return snprintf(buf, len, "%d.%09u", tmp0, abs(tmp1));
+		return snprintf(buf, len, "%s%u.%09u", sign, abs(tmp0), abs(tmp1));
 	case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2:
 		tmp = shift_right((s64)vals[0] * 1000000000LL, vals[1]);
 		tmp0 = (int)div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000LL, &tmp1);
-		return snprintf(buf, len, "%d.%09u", tmp0, abs(tmp1));
+		return snprintf(buf, len, "%s%u.%09u", sign, abs(tmp0), abs(tmp1));
 	case IIO_VAL_INT_MULTIPLE:
 	{
 		int i;
-- 
2.23.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux