On 21. 08. 19 4:10, Phil Reid wrote: > On 20/08/2019 22:11, Michal Simek wrote: >> On systems with multiple ina2xx chips it is impossible to find out which >> iio device is which one based on probe order. That's why it is >> necessary to >> setup better name based on possition. >> The patch is reusing dev_name which is setup by core with client->name. >> >> name char array was setup to 128 byte length to correspond the same name >> length by HID device. >> >> Before this patch: >> iio:device9: ina226 (buffer capable) >> After: >> iio:device9: ina226-3-004a (buffer capable) > > Could this break existing user space code that's just looking for just > ina226. > I2c bus numbers aren't all that great at id'ing devices either. It's > better than > nothing but depending on what cards we have plugged into our system the > same device gets > a different bus number. Fair point. Let's wait what dt guys say about label property. I can simply drop this patch and use just this. indio_dev->name = of_get_property(np, "label", NULL) ? : id->name; Thanks, Michal
