On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:29:11PM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > Hmm, I actually did not give much thought to that -1. > I'll check into this and see about a V3. > It may make more sense to just fix the original > `__sysfs_match_string()`, but I'll need to go through the users of > this function and see. I was thinking about existing users of such (with "gaps") cases. Not all of them have NULL there and would like to avoid some members. Though, I think that we may ignore NULL items if -1 is supplied. Think as well about ARRAY_SIZE() as given to that. And consider to fix match_string() accordingly. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
