Re: RFC on IIO AD7292 driver GSoC proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 3:17 PM Marcelo Schmitt
<marcelo.schmitt1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 04/08, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 10:46 PM Marcelo Schmitt
> > <marcelo.schmitt1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > My name is Marcelo Schmitt, I'm a computer science student learning
> > > how to contribute to the Linux Kernel in the IIO subsystem. I was told
> > > by a friend that Google was encouraging people who contribute to open
> > > source projects through the GSoC program and that there was a project
> > > for developing a new IIO driver. I intend to continue contributing to
> > > IIO and, if possible, engage in this GSoC project. As suggested by
> > > GSoC organization, I shared a draft proposal for the project here
> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vOegyoC5b90jwLe1PBz4IbKGXaXMozi-RldS5OAZz4Y.
> > > It would be really great if anyone could comment on it.
> > > Sorry for sending it so close to dead line date.
> > >
> >
> > Overall doc looks good.
> > One note about the steps: ideally the AD7292 driver should not be put
> > into staging, it's a new driver.
> > Hence there is no reason to have a "move out-of-staging" step.
> >
> > The current IIO drivers in staging are there, because initially the
> > IIO framework was done in staging, and some drivers were not updated
> > because of time/priorities.
>
> Thanks Alexandru.
> OK, understood. But where one should commit code for a driver in
> development as will be the case for AD7292? iio main tree will
> probably not be a good idea. Does any development branch exists?
> testing2, compiletest?

I guess I'm not very familiar with how GSoC works.
I guess work can be done in any public place.
And then the final parts can be submitted to the IIO list as standard.

Regarding the DT bindings, I'm afraid you will have to make them in YAML format.
Just be aware of this.

This is a recent change to DT bindings.
I'm also trying out this new YAML thingi [for personal curiosity].
They don't look too difficult, but they are a bit weird. But I've
always found YAML a bit weird.

>
> >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > Marcelo



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux